The Federal Court, in a unanimous decision on Feb 27, dismissed the appeals of three Muslim converts and a Muslim by birth to have their applications to apostate be heard in the civil high court.
The apex court ruled that the Sarawak syariah court had jurisdiction to hear their apostasy applications.
Court of Appeal president Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin, in his ruling, said even though there was no provision in the syariah court, there was a section in the Majlis Islam Sarawak Ordinance 2001 that could be used to hear apostasy cases.
The other members of the five-man bench were Ahmad Maarop, Hasan Lah, Ramly Ali and Jeffrey Tan Kok Wha.
The dismissal means that Salina Jau Abdullah, Jenny Peter, Mohd Syafiq Abdullah @ Tiong Choo Ting and Syarifah Nooraffyzza Wan Hosen, who is an ethnic Malay and Muslim by birth, have to go to the syariah court for their apostasy applications.
Zulkefli said the appeal had no merit when responding to the converts’ counsel, Baru Bian, who said the Sarawak syariah court’s jurisdiction over apostasy matters could not be read into the Syariah Court Ordinance 2001 by implication, when there was no expressed provision under the Syariah Court Ordinance 2001 concerning conversions into Islam.
Syarifah Nooraffyzza had left Islam to embrace Christianity, while Salina, Jenny and Tiong had converted to Islam to facilitate their marriage to Muslim partners.
Salina, who is of Kayan-Kenyah ethnicity, was a Christian before her marriage to Malay-Muslim Shazali Saleh.
She had taken on her Muslim name after her conversion, but following her divorce, she returned to Christianity.
Jenny, a Melanau, converted to Islam to marry Nazri Abdul Rahman. After her divorce, she returned to Christianity, too.
Tiong, who is of Chinese-Bidayuh parentage, converted to Islam to marry Siti Aishah Badahar, but when his wife died, he returned to Christianity.
The four had, in 2015, filed applications in the high court for a judicial review, for the declaration that they are Christians; an Order of Mandamus (a judicial remedy in the form of an order from a superior court) to compel the director of the Sarawak Islamic Affairs Department or state Islamic Religious Council to issue them a “letter of release” from Islam, or Surat Murtad and, an Order of Mandamus to compel the director-general of the National Registration Department (NRD) to drop “ Islam” as their religion on their MyKad and other documents, and to change information on them in the national registry to reflect that they are Christians.
Their applications were only at the “Leave Stage,” where objections were raised by their counsel against the grounds that the civil high court had no jurisdiction or power to hear such applications as they related to apostasy, which fell under the syariah court.
The argument was based on an interpretation of Article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution, and this argument or submission is supported by three Federal Court cases.
Baru argued that the high court had jurisdiction to hear apostasy cases, saying the state syariah court was “not clothed with that power, to decide on apostasy cases, as the Sarawak Syariah Court Ordinance 2001 does not provide for this issue to be dealt with by the shariah court.”
He pointed to letters from the Kuching Syariah Court to the four, which he said confirmed that it had no power to deal with apostasy cases.
The four converts had, on various occasions, submitted applications to NRD to have their Muslim names on their MyKad changed to their non-Muslim names, while Syarifah Nooraffyzza had applied to use the name “Vanessa Elizabeth.”
Their applications, however, were rejected as they had failed to obtain a “letter of release” from Islam, from the Sarawak Islamic Affairs Department.
The state Islamic Affairs Department later informed them that it had no jurisdiction in Sarawak to issue such a letter.
Article reproduced from Herald Malaysia online